HINTERGRUND, Heft 04 -10 - Iran: Der „Zwanzigjährige Krieg“

Iran: Der „Zwanzigjährige Krieg“

Von KNUT MELLENTHIN


Quellen und Anmerkungen

1) A concurrent resolution expressing the concern of Congress over Iran’s development of the means to produce nuclear weapons. S. CON. RES. 81.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sc108-81

2) Expressing the concern of Congress over Iran’s development of the means to produce nuclear weapons. H. CON. RES. 398.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/congress/2004_cr/h-con-res-398.htm

3) „Did the President Declare ‚Secret War‘ Against Syria and Iran? The Washington Note, 11. Januar 2007.
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001869.php

4) David Espo und Matthew Lee: „Democrats Back Off on Iran Language“.
http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/1586

5) Seymour M. Hersh: „The Next Act. Is a damaged Administration less likely to attack Iran, or more?“ The New Yorker, 27. November 2006.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/11/27/061127fa_fact

6) „Bush: I would understand if Israel chose to attack Iran“. Haaretz, 20. November 2006.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/bush-i-would-understand-if-israel-chose-to-attack-iran-1.205516

7) Seymour M. Hersh: „The Iran Plans. Would President Bush go to war to stop Tehran from getting the bomb?“ The New Yorker, 17. April 2006.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/04/17/060417fa_fact

8) Seymour M. Hersh: „The Coming Wars. What the Pentagon can now do in secret.“ The New Yorker, 24. Januar 2005.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/01/24/050124fa_fact

9) „Seymour Hersh: U.S. Conducting Covert Operations in Iran For Possible Military Strike“. Democracy Now, 18. Januar 2005.
http://www.democracynow.org/2005/1/18/seymour_hersh_u_s_conducting_covert

10) „Israel plant Angriff auf iranische Atomanlagen“. Spiegel, 11. Oktober 2003.
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,269355,00.html

11) „Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran“. Sunday Times, 7. Januar 2007. Im Internet nicht mehr zugänglich.
Siehe auch: „Geheimplan für Atomschlag gegen Iran?“. Focus, 7. Januar 2007.
http://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/nahost/israel_aid_122198.html

12) „President Bush Addresses Nation on Iraq War“, Washington Post, 10. Januar 2007.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002208.html

13) „Israel seeks all clear for Iran air strike“. Telegraph, 24. Februar 2007.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1543726/Israel-seeks-all-clear-for-Iran-air-strike.html

14) Robert Berger: „Israel Says Military Action Against Iran Possible“. GlobalSecurity.org, 9. Juni 2007.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2007/iran-070609-voa01.htm

15) „Israeli official: U.S. is not doing enough on Iran nukes“. Haaretz, 12. Dezember 2007.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/israeli-official-u-s-is-not-doing-enough-on-iran-nukes-1.235073

16) Wayne Madsen: A Bush pre-election strike on Iran? White House insiders report „October Surprise“ imminent. 23. Oktober 2004.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAD410A.html
William Pfaff: An ‚October Surprise‘? Neocons have Iran in their Sights. International Herald Tribune, 26. August 2004.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0826-15.htm

17) Kapitel I, Artikel 2: (…) 3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
3. Alle Mitglieder legen ihre internationalen Streitigkeiten durch friedliche Mittel so bei, daß der Weltfriede, die internationale Sicherheit und die Gerechtigkeit nicht gefährdet werden.
4. Alle Mitglieder unterlassen in ihren internationalen Beziehungen jede gegen die territoriale Unversehrtheit oder die politische Unabhängigkeit eines Staates gerichtete oder sonst mit den Zielen der Vereinten Nationen unvereinbare Androhung oder Anwendung von Gewalt.
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter1.shtml
http://www.unric.org/de/charta?start=1

18) Nach Kenneth R. Timmermann, Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Cases of Iran, Syria and Libya (Los Angeles: Simon Wiesenthal Center, 1992), Seite 43.

19) „Senator says Iran, Iraq seek N-Bomb“, The Age (Australien), 27. Juni 1984.

20) „C.I.A. Says Iran Makes Progress On Atom Arms“. New York Times, 30. November 1992.
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/30/world/cia-says-iran-makes-progress-on-atom-arms.html

21) „U.S. Outlines Concern Over North Korean A-Arms“. New York Times, 25. Februar 1993.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/02/25/world/us-outlines-concern-over-north-korean-a-arms.html

22) „U.S. Says Iran Ended Atomic Arms Work“. New York Times, 3. Dezember 2007. Die zur Veröffentlichung freigegebene Kurzfassung des NIE kann von dort aus aufgerufen werden.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/world/middleeast/03cnd-iran.html

23) „We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons
program; we also assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is
keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons. (…) We judge with high confidence that the halt lasted at least several years. (…) We assess with moderate confidence Tehran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program as of mid-2007, but we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons. (…) Tehran’s decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005. Our assessment
that the program probably was halted primarily in response to international pressure suggests Iran may be more vulnerable to influence on the issue than we judged previously.“

24) „UK, USA Protest Against Czech Republic’s Planned Iranian Delivery“. BBC, 15. Januar 2000.

25) „All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.“
http://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2005/npttreaty.html

26) „Trotz des Rückzugs der Großen wächst der Handel mit dem Golf-Staat. Im ersten Halbjahr verkauften deutsche Firmen Waren für 1,85 Milliarden Euro dorthin, das waren 14 Prozent mehr als in den ersten sechs Monaten 2009 – Maschinen, Metalle, Chemieprodukte. Aus dem Iran kauften sie Waren für 280 Millionen Euro, das war sogar ein Plus von 88 Prozent. ‚Das Geschäft verlagert sich von großen Konzernen zu mittelständischen Firmen‘, sagt Michael Tockuss, Geschäftsführer des privaten Vereins Deutsch-iranische Handelskammer. Auf sie könne die Politik weniger Druck ausüben als auf börsennotierte Konzerne.“ („Deutsche Firmen drängen in den Iran“, Der Tagesspiegel, 24. September 2010.
http://www.tagesspiegel.de/wirtschaft/deutsche-firmen-draengen-in-den-iran/1941986.html

Drucken

Drucken

Teilen